China’s broking firms are having a party on the primary markets. This shows the value creating potential India’s financial sector may have.
Most Indian broking firms are currently looking to raise money and in some cases, are looking to find strategic investors. Are these companies attractive to either the strategic or the retail investor?
For answers, perhaps look at some recent cues come from China. India’s financial companies, which are predominantly in the market to raise money, would be heartened by the amount of capital raising Chinese companies have done in recent months.
Citic Securities raised $3.3billion recently, in the biggest IPO by a Chinese financial security firm. Haitong Securities, China’s sixth largest broking firm, plans to raise $3.4billion soon. Goldstate Securities reportedly aims to raise $4-5 billion in a domestic IPO by March 2008. Everbright Securities, part of a large state-owned conglomerate, also plans to do a multibillion dollar IPO next year.
China’s banks have done even bigger IPOs. China Construction Bank, among the big four Chinese banks, plans to raise $7.4 billion, in what would be mainland China’s largest IPO. This bank had earlier raised $9.2 billion in 2005, but from overseas markets. The big daddy of Chinese banks, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, raised $19 billion in what would be the biggest global IPO ever. Bank of China, another member of the Chinese big 4 banks, had raised $9.7billion in 2005. China appears to have a few national level banks and around 115 or so city commercial banks. Some recent IPOs have seen even these raise around half a billion dollars or more.
For someone sitting in India, these numbers are clearly eye popping. No security firm in India has even raised $500 million from the market, while the sixth largest Chinese firm plans to raise 3 times that amount. Motilal Oswal, perhaps among the top 5 domestic broking firms, raised around Rs 246 crore ($60 million or so) from its IPO. Other than ICICI Bank (IBN), which managed to raise upward of $4 billion in June/July, Indian banks (barring SBI or maybe HDFC bank (HDB)) don’t have the scale to raise even more than $1 billion. China’s domestic market it appears can support capital raising of over $7 billion from one outfit. That's approximately the amount the entire Indian market can support in a year, all IPOs combined.
The difference in GDP does not explain this massive difference in financial sector numbers. China’s GDP is around twice the size of India’s. The size of their respective markets does not explain this either. China’s stock market capitalization is around $1,500 billion, about two times India’s size. In fact, till 2-3 years ago, China’s market cap was less than India’s.
China’s financial market thus appears to be disproportionately bigger compared to India, and much better capitalized. That may be the reason why global banks and security firms are keen to get a presence in India while local assets are still cheap. The largest domestic broking firm is perhaps not worth more than 2 billion dollars. All others are perhaps less than one billion dollars in market value. Most banks are small too. While ICICI Bank is around $20 billion in market cap, and SBI is around $15billion, a few others like HDFC Bank have some size, most others are less than $1 billion in market cap.
India’s financial sector can thus potentially create a lot of wealth going forward. The transformation of Chinese brokerages gives a clue. According to a media article, 7 of top 10 Chinese broking firms for which financials where available, registered a combined loss of almost a billion dollars in 2005. These same firms reported a net profit of over $2 billion in the first six months of this year. Assuming they make a net profit of $4 billion this year, and given that Chinese firms trade at a P/E of around 40-50x normally, these 7 firms are perhaps worth a market cap of around $100 billion. Now contrast with this the billion dollar loss these firms made in 2005, and the fact that the Chinese stock market was smaller than India’s till recently.
What is amazing is China appears to have an equity cult bigger than India’s now. Haitong, for example, has two million clients, served from 124 outlets around China. The largest Indian retail broking firm has a little over half this number as its client base. In April and May of this year, retail investors were opening around 300,000 accounts a day! Having started much later on the capitalist path, China current has around 3 times the retail investors India has. And they appear to trade a lot more than India's do.
Looking at this another way, you may well say that India’s financial sector has a lot more wealth creation yet to do. From broking firms to banks, there may be lots of stock picks there for the long-term investor.
Friday, September 14, 2007
Unlocking the Massive Potential In India's Financial Sector
Bancolombia Announces Unconsolidated Net Income of Ps 78,960 Million for the Month of August 2007, Totaling Ps 505,397 Million
Bancolombia Announces Unconsolidated Net Income of Ps 78,960 Million for the Month of August 2007, Totaling Ps 505,397 Million for the First Eight Months of 2007
MEDELLIN, Colombia, Sept. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Bancolombia S.A. ("Bancolombia") reported unconsolidated net income of Ps 78,960 million during the past month of August.*
During August, total net interest income, including investment securities, amounted to Ps 165,069 million. Additionally, total net fees and income from services totaled Ps 56,485 million.
Total assets amounted to Ps 30.78 trillion, total deposits totaled Ps 19.16 trillion and BANCOLOMBIA's total shareholders' equity amounted to Ps 4.64 trillion.
BANCOLOMBIA's (unconsolidated) level of past due loans as a percentage of total loans was 2.64% as of August 31, 2007, and the level of allowance for past due loans was 137.01% as of the same date.
Market Share
According to ASOBANCARIA (Colombia's national banking association), BANCOLOMBIA's market share of the Colombian financial system as of August 2007 was as follows: 18.1% of total deposits, 21.7% of total net loans, 18.7% of total savings accounts, 21.2% of total checking accounts and 14.7% of total time deposits.
* This report corresponds to the unconsolidated financial statements of Bancolombia. The numbers contained herein are subject to review by the relevant Colombian authorities. This information has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in Colombia and is stated in nominal terms.
Source: Bancolombia S.A
Kookmin looking to take on HSBC in KEB fight
HSBC's bid to buy Korea Exchange Bank, already under regulatory pressure, could face a challenge from Kookmin Bank (NYSE:KB), South Korea's biggest lender.
Lone Star Funds last year cancelled a $7.3bn sale agreement that would have given Kookmin 71 per cent of KEB amid probes of Lone Star's original 2003 takeover of KEB.
Kim Ki-hong, vice-president at Kookmin, said his bank could still have a chance to bid for KEB if HSBC fails to win regulatory approval for its conditional offer.
"I don't think we've lost the game, it's rather on hold," Mr Kim told reporters. "We still have a chance and are thoroughly preparing for the possibility."
Mr Kim hinted that Kookmin may offer a higher price for KEB if it was given another chance.
"We're not so bitter about the broken deal because the public now understands better why Kookmin should acquire KEB," Mr Kim said. "In hindsight, it is proven that our deal with Lone Star was quite good in terms of price and other conditions."
Financial authorities have repeatedly hinted that they would prefer for local companies to become the new owners of KEB and Woori Bank amid public concerns about growing foreign influence in the financial sector.
Kookmin was previously to pay Won15,200 per share. Under the deal signed with Lone Star last week for 51 per cent of KEB, HSBC is to pay $6.3bn, or Won18,045 per share. HSBC started due diligence this week.
The Financial Supervisory Commission has said it would not consider any application to buy KEB while court cases relating to Lone Star's 2003 purchase of the bank were ongoing.
Lone Star has been cleared of wrongdoing but former government and bank officials remain under investigation.
The probes were launched after a public outcry over the big tax-free profit that the fund group would make over the sale of its KEB stake.
Kim Yong-duk, FSC governor, said this week that the Financial Supervisory Service would evaluate the legitimacy and financial strength of KEB's potential buyer as well as the efficiency of the local financial industry and the bidder's contribution to the domestic financial sector.
By FT.com